3 ms·

1. HTML (no fashionable crap like Bootstrap or flexbox is capable of giving me somethong as simple as XAML's grid, also dozens of quirks - http://wtfhtmlcss.com

by CmonDev 12y ago

1. HTML (no fashionable crap like Bootstrap or flexbox is capable of giving me somethong as simple as XAML's grid, also dozens of quirks - http://wtfhtmlcss.com http://wtfhtmlcss.com). 2. JavaScript (not just dynamic but weak as well + dozens of quirks - http://wtfjs.com http://wtfjs.com). 3. Node.js and its hype, but at least I can avoid it.

matthewmacleod 12y ago
I don't really agree with any of these. JS and HTML are both pretty quirky - it's partially a legacy of their success and origins. But so are most languages - I don't really think that HTML, CSS or Javascript are particularly sucky.
sehr 12y ago
Node.js is so last year. But in all honesty, it's transformed browser development. Common JS is everywhere now
- na85 12y ago
  >Common JS is everywhere now That's not a good thing.
  - sehr 12y ago
    Yeah, standardization & being able to use the largest package manager on the planet really blows! ... Ah nevermind, I can see you're very enthusiastic about anything anti-javascript. Carry on