>>You are just saying that because I can't show proof that electric cars have worked in a country on a large scale we can't build electric cars. You are sugges

>>You are just saying that because I can't show proof that electric cars have worked in a country on a large scale we can't build electric cars. You are suggesting a bit larger problem than electric cars, it is more like nuclear driven cars that would literally explode with Megatons if any of them crashed... (No, that is not an exaggeration, considering the repeated number of mass murders/starvations of at least millions wherever these experiments have been done -- China, Soviet, North Korea, Kampuchea, etc.) >I showed you one alternative, Parecon, I asked specifically for: "You can't list an example that has worked for a big population in an industrialized world -- and given them an open society." Your answer was not relevant. but you knew that -- there is just no example -- and you lack the integrity to admit that. >You are afraid of anything that might mean a change. First you are upset by my lack of humanity in not wanting to change the world economy -- and then you call me coward for not wanting to do experiments that traditionally kills tens of millions of people. Not coherent. But you knew that. BTW, your extraordinary claims lack references (e.g. "capitalism is only good for a small percentage of a population" is not how Eastern Europe tells it!). But then, you prefer news stories to Wikipedia with its references -- so there might not be enough TV programs on the net...? Never mind, since you couldn't answer a single of my points regarding hunger above -- and lacked the integrity to admit it -- I only skimmed this. The only question is if you're trolling or fanatic. In either case, you're a waste of time.