4 ms·
I'm not sure what this means. In haskell you are free to use monads "the Ceylon way" if that's what you want to do; there is no reason you'd have to leverage th
by theseoafs 12y ago
I'm not sure what this means. In haskell you are free to use monads "the Ceylon way" if that's what you want to do; there is no reason you'd have to leverage the composability of monads if you don't want its added convenience. There is no added monadic overhead if you don't use Maybes in that way.