3 ms·

>> no rational argument against it People getting injured? Reoccurring flashbacks?

• aberzombie 12y ago
  Study citation needed, or this is the very definition of FUD.
• ghshephard 12y ago
  People getting injured is a good argument against horseback riding, and climbing mount everest - but neither of those activities is illegal. Shouldn't individuals be allowed to make informed choices regarding their activity, particularly if it does not harm those around them? Driving a car is dangerous, and it kills many innocent people who aren't driving - but we haven't mandated mass transit because we believe in the freedom to move.
  • frozenport 12y ago
    Consider guns or even certain fireworks. There are things that are dangerous that can be done by the foolish, the laws for regulating these are well motivated.
    • ghshephard 12y ago
      I'm certainly not opposed to the regulation of psychedelics (particularly keeping them away from younger children) though I expect the number of deaths which would occur to unregulated use of MDMA, LSD, Psilocybin, Marijuana, Peyote, DMT, Ketamine are pretty minimal.