You make 0 sense. I'm not sure if you just have trouble following what I wrote or what the issue is. > If your assertion is correct that Everett truly "broke"

You make 0 sense. I'm not sure if you just have trouble following what I wrote or what the issue is. > If your assertion is correct that Everett truly "broke" Stellar 1) That is not what I said. Much like the person who doesn't understand what "farming" means in context, I'm just going to assume poor comprehension on your part. 2) Even if that is what I said, he gained internet points and attention. That is still technically speaking "gain", at which point...you are still wrong. So, I think the issue here is: 1) You can't understand what I wrote either due to me or your poor reading comprehension. 2) You don't realize what you said is inherently false, regardless. --- At this point, I'm mainly just amused by how everyone leaps up to defend a guy who basically stole Stellars and then waited until he was called out to say anything. I wonder how well that would work at a bank. Care to try it for me?