3 ms·
> or quicker to load It could certainly be faster to load since a server can push out static files far faster and at a higher rate than compared to say Wordpre
by nacs 12y ago
> or quicker to load
It could certainly be faster to load since a server can push out static files far faster and at a higher rate than compared to say Wordpress/PHP (even with heavy-caching of pages).
- baby 12y agoIf the code is not bloated, and better, if it's cached, I don't think you'll see a notable difference (milliseconds don't count for user experience). I think that feeling of speed is because most static blogs don't have a lot of images, javascript, etc...