I agree. When I see "hacker proof", I usually assume it's a corporation that's paid some mid-rate contractor to create a system that's "hacker proof" per their

I agree. When I see "hacker proof", I usually assume it's a corporation that's paid some mid-rate contractor to create a system that's "hacker proof" per their specification (which probably uses those exact words). I've not seen many serious projects use this term. This may well be an exception -- it's possible that the authors are not native-English speakers and fail to appreciate the term's nuances. All in all, it looks like a very interesting project, but I'd urge the author to use more different terminology to describe their system.