First, as the other poster mentioned, it was an interview. Second, when the NYT quotes something that is already written with known errors, the editors are guar

First, as the other poster mentioned, it was an interview. Second, when the NYT quotes something that is already written with known errors, the editors are guaranteed to either fix the errors and carefully note that they had to fix the grammar or add a [SIC] because that's the kind of people editors are.