3 ms·

The author forgets to specify, but he is talking about Common Lisp, not Lisp in general.

• deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
• frossie 17y ago
  While we're at it, the name "LISP" is obsolete. It's reminiscent of variants of the broader lisp family of languages, circa 1980. We're talking about Common Lisp instead, often shortened to "Lisp", being a much more modern language." (Unless the author added that after the OP was submitted)
  • astine 17y ago
    I'm sorry, I mistated, the author forgat to specify what he meant by 'Lisp' before writting a page and a half on it. He did get around to it near the end of the article when all of the laypeople left confused about Lisp.
    • arb 17y ago
      I've added a note at the top disambiguating the term too. Thanks for the feedback. :-)