3 ms·
my favorite part about this is the "show frames" version of the page. now thats what made this a real 1999 read for me. edit: from a UX perspective having the
by BorisMelnik 12y ago
my favorite part about this is the "show frames" version of the page. now thats what made this a real 1999 read for me.
edit: from a UX perspective having the frames enabled was actually quite nice. I am sure there are tons of new ways to do this these days with AJAX / JS / CSS but not too shabby.
- userbinator 12y agoI agree the frames are quite nice; they're also the simplest way to get this functionality, and doing it any other way would probably entail far more work and complexity with an end-result that isn't as portable (e.g. no JS, text-mode browser, etc.) The content:styling ratio is also a lot higher, and IMHO that's a good thing for this type of content.