> I don't see any grounds for what "93% who have agreed the restructured payments can sue the 7% who haven't" - what claim do you see there? I don't know wheth

> I don't see any grounds for what "93% who have agreed the restructured payments can sue the 7% who haven't" - what claim do you see there? I don't know whether I see a claim, but I wondered whether a clever lawyer would. Reading around, I'm positing ideas for what might happen next.