3 ms·
It's not even half science, it's just a big slide deck of FUD padded with a healthy amount of entitlement.
by thrownaway2424 12y ago
It's not even half science, it's just a big slide deck of FUD padded with a healthy amount of entitlement.
- chiph 12y agoBe honest with yourself: If you got a ticket where the indicated speed was massively different than the speed you were actually travelling, you'd fight it too. And you might do some research into the validity of the reading, as well. You'd especially do it in a state where the law says "x" mph over the limit and your license may get suspended (meaning you walk for 60 days). It'd be worth fighting for.
- gknoy 12y agoEspecially if it were in a residential area where you had been deliberately careful. If I got a ticket saying that I'd been driving 40 in a 25 zone, when I had been carefully watching my spedometer at ~20s, I'd feel pretty wronged. I'm not sure I'd have the resources to fight it, but I would certainly want to.
- Estragon 12y agoCan you cite some parts which reflect entitlement?
- smackfu 12y agoFUD, eh? So that's Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. I don't really see any fear, and I hope that any legal defense is going to push pretty heavily on uncertainty and doubt. Don't quite see the problem.