> You've changed your position fundamentally, from saying > you have nothing to lose... I specifically used the words "if I understand you correctly" as an

> You've changed your position fundamentally, from saying > you have nothing to lose... I specifically used the words "if I understand you correctly" as an invitation to the author to share more information, and to signal to the reader that I was making an assumption about his financial position, i.e. I assume he has very little capital. My exact words: > If I understand you correctly, you currently have very > little capital to protect. Which you've now twisted into: > ...you have nothing to lose... Notice the change in meaning?