More on point: So I am understanding correctly message passing will most likely by the paradigm you encourage? And, less on point: > Other answer: we will be

More on point: So I am understanding correctly message passing will most likely by the paradigm you encourage? And, less on point: > Other answer: we will be talking about our multicore ocaml implementation at ICFP in September. I still don't want to see it in Mirage though :-) Wait what what what? So it is ready for prime-time? (Note, I did not say production.) I remember reading about it on Jane Street, but thought there will still proposals and lots of theoretical and planning wrinkles to iron out before an implementation became reality. I do not want to derail this informative post by you anymore, but do you have a link to more on that topic? And I remember seeing mention of Irmin and not getting how ti fit into your work, asvm. Now seeing it as an answer to my question makes sense. And thanks for your work on Real World Ocaml. I have decided to get back into programming, and some of my co-workers were taking CS classes and systems programming (ironically Harvard Extension School, I can't afford it but good for them) used OCaml. This reminded me to come take a look and I find your book, and the OCaml resurgence fascinating. Maybe one done, I will look at the Haxe compiler and go: "it is not so complicated, I get that now." Only in OCaml could I see people doing such crazy shit.