4 ms·
I kept giggling at its poor recognition. It's comically bad, but I think it's a step in the right direction. It was very fast at incorrectly identifying letters
by cheshire137 12y ago
I kept giggling at its poor recognition. It's comically bad, but I think it's a step in the right direction. It was very fast at incorrectly identifying letters. If only it were very fast and mostly correct.
- azakai 12y agoIt is good at recognizing machine-generated text - hit the blue arrow - and not that good at human-scribbled text with a mouse, I find. I assume you were testing hand-written text?