> And you obviously missed the thinly veiled Star Wars reference. Perhaps next time I'll put it in quotes. Your statement "You certainly can built Quark/Atom S

> And you obviously missed the thinly veiled Star Wars reference. Perhaps next time I'll put it in quotes. Your statement "You certainly can built Quark/Atom SBCs into a "RasberryPi" like device" was supposed to counter an argument I never made. Yeah, it's petty, but I felt the need to point that out. Obviously, this is not in any shape or form about your Star Wars reference. > I'm not sure how you read hostility, but okay. It's my impression. It may well be wrong, but here's how I read it: You come across as hostile in a number of ways. The issue above is a good example. I perceive your comment as passive aggressive, but more importantly you drag the discussion to areas that are beside the point. It feels like you corrected me about positions I never expressed, and when I criticized this you switched yet again to something unrelated and attacked that. What I dislike about these maneuvers is that they work. If done right, this combination of abrasiveness and well-executed straw men can get you pretty far in most forums, including this one.