3 ms·
Next major release of PHP to be named PHP 7
- metabrew 12y agoWhy skip a version? Wasn't clear from that thread.
- msantos 12y agoPHP 6 existed (check commits in the public repo) but was abandoned and never released to public. The voting page lists more info https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php6#vote https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php6#vote
- RossM 12y agoAnnoyingly, a few authors decided to jump the gun and publish books around PHP 6. I think this was the main deciding point. On the one hand, it might be confusing for a newcomer who thinks that they're getting a book on the latest and greatest; on the other, perhaps they should check publication dates. Either way, it wasn't a particularly important decision - any number signifying a major version bump, greater than 5, would have been fine.
- rrss1122 12y agoI don't know about that last point. Why even keep version numbers at all if you're going to skip over a version? Chrome started the path to irrelevancy for version numbers, PHP is following the trend.
- ramy_d 12y agoYeah, http://www.amazon.ca/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=php+6 http://www.amazon.ca/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=php+6 I wonder if publishing against "vaporware" (not exactly, but anyway) is an expected risk in the industry. Would be interesting to hear what the people who are affected in that sense think of this.
- mikey_p 12y agoPHP 6 was originally started back on 2005 with a very clear and well advertised set of features. Many of those have been merged into 5.x releases except for the largest item which involved improved unicode handling, which has been dropped entirely. I'd rather see them skip ahead to 7 than to try to re-write the existing definition of PHP 6.