Even the court's hint that combining multiple abstract ideas in a way that improves the state of the art of existing tech provides no clear distinction between

Even the court's hint that combining multiple abstract ideas in a way that improves the state of the art of existing tech provides no clear distinction between what is and isn't patentable. Until the Court understands that composing mathematical expressions doesn't turn them into a different kind of thing, and writes clear rules one way or the other about what's patentable, nothing is really resolved.