The anti-airbnb side claims that airbnb takes apartments or rooms off the market for people who want to live full-time in that city. (thus increasing the price

The anti-airbnb side claims that airbnb takes apartments or rooms off the market for people who want to live full-time in that city. (thus increasing the price of available rooms) The pro-airbnb side, I'm guessing, would claim: 1.) Why should certain people (renters) get preferential treatment to live in a city over other people (visitors). 2.) Are flat/apartment/home owners not entitled to do with their property what they wish?