> I, unfortunately, can't come up with many good, non-tinfoil rebuttals. You could make a "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" argument based on

> I, unfortunately, can't come up with many good, non-tinfoil rebuttals. You could make a "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" argument based on analogy: A reveals B to be the rapist of C, hence A is to blame for the punishment that befalls B?! Or, closer to reality (sadly), C gets accused of smearing the precious reputation of B by saying something. PS: As for the "nothing to hide" fallacy, as if everyone who is concerned had "something to hide"! Perhaps you could remind her that even if she (thinks she) has nothing to hide, an orthogonal reason to care, perhaps the strongest, is that by resisting in whatever ways you can -- by changing your own behavior, for a start -- you contribute to the preservation of liberty.