4 ms·
I wasn't arguing about the term "memory leak", but the misleading title's implication that it's a design flaw in the C# specification (or, for that matter, Micr
by wyday 19y ago
I wasn't arguing about the term "memory leak", but the misleading title's implication that it's a design flaw in the C# specification (or, for that matter, Microsoft's or Mono's implementation). It's not. It's a memory leak due to the programmers error.
- boucher 19y agoAnd I wasn't arguing that the title wasn't misleading. Just that while it may be slightly misleading, the article itself clearly puts it in context. perhaps: "used to express reluctant or qualified agreement or acceptance."