3 ms·
I'm wondering if it would be useful to plug groupcache into this. It's what Google uses for serving downloads (e.g., Chrome downloads). Inherently distributed a
by ColinCera 12y ago
I'm wondering if it would be useful to plug groupcache into this. It's what Google uses for serving downloads (e.g., Chrome downloads). Inherently distributed and self-balancing. I might give that a try.
- mxpxrocks10 12y agogreat idea.
- xin3td 12y agoLooks promising, but might need to add Doozer to the stack as groupcache has an issue with maintaining a list of peers where the cached data is distributed. Definitely worth looking into though. https://github.com/ha/doozerd https://github.com/ha/doozerd