4 ms·
Surely tennis-fandom can be proven? (I know, not your point, but that's what makes religion complicated). At least I'm a 100% sure tennis exists.
by garbad 12y ago
Surely tennis-fandom can be proven? (I know, not your point, but that's what makes religion complicated). At least I'm a 100% sure tennis exists.
- jonnathanson 12y agoSure. But as you said, that's not really the point of my analogy. I used it more to illustrate the idea that atheism, like tennis non-fandom, can be a conditional state, "called" only when the subject of religion (or tennis) comes up. Religion is a much more fraught subject than tennis. But the precise subject of the analogy wasn't intended to be 1:1 congruous. I'd be sitting on my butt for weeks, trying to come up with a different analogy, if I felt I needed a measure-for-measure match. :)