4 ms·

Some interesting symbolic stats: [1] http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=computer.smartphone.mobile http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=computer.smartphone

by eamsen 12y ago

Some interesting symbolic stats: [1] http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=computer.smartphone.mobile http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=computer.smartphone.mo... [2] http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=security.freedom http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=security.freedom [3] http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=men.women http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=men.women [4] http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=homophobic.homosexual.queer http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=homophobic.homosexual.... [5] http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=love.money http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=love.money

pavanky 12y ago
I think his vs her is more interesting than men vs women. http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=his.her http://chronicle.nytlabs.com/?keyword=his.her Surprisingly, the difference seems to be be fairly constant.
- eamsen 12y ago
  I would expect that to be more constant when individuals are addressed. My interest was towards addressing men and women as a group, which - to some degree - would reflect the 'relevance' of the group for the given time in media.