3 ms·
How the hell is this abusive? Notice how he isn't cursing at any one person? Notice how he points out exactly what gcc is doing wrong? Notice how he made a bug
by ayrx 12y ago
How the hell is this abusive? Notice how he isn't cursing at any one person? Notice how he points out exactly what gcc is doing wrong? Notice how he made a bug report to get the problem fixed? Notice how no one in that email thread had any problems with his tone?
- RexRollman 12y agoCorrect. There is a difference between curing in the course of talking and cursing at someone.
- lamontcg 12y ago"...your compiler is pure and utter shit." That is throwing the guy he's responding to and the whole GCC compiler team under the bus with a very thinly veiled personal attack. If he was just hurling insults at the code, I could defend him, but that would look more like: "What the 4.9.0 compiler is doing to my scheduler is fucking insane. It can't be spilling constants like this because we can get hit by an interrupt while the stack is insane and then we'll be screwed. And this other shit is worse and just has to fucking go." Less pointing at the other devs and screaming that they're incompetent and more pointing at the code and screaming that its going to hose the shit out of the scheduler.