2 ms·
You're not wrong, but that's the kind of hair-splitting (beam-splitting?) that the arguments promulgated by the NSA, et al, depend upon.
by rosser 12y ago
You're not wrong, but that's the kind of hair-splitting (beam-splitting?) that the arguments promulgated by the NSA, et al, depend upon.
- aragot 12y agoThat's why I'm doubtful about checking "what the constitution intended". Maybe the US just needs a 28th Amendment stating new rights about the numeric world. We've gone through 2 technological revolutions since 1980, of course the constitution is outdated. For starters, clusters of data are dangerous in terms of privacy and theft, exponentially with their size. Is it allowed to have a firecracker at home? Is it allowed to have several thousand of them? Same goes for data, whether you're a corporation or a state.