3 ms·
Other - Using standard nomenclature in a non-standard way I'd call myself a "Spiritual Atheist." I had been an atheist of the "cold" variety: life spontaneous
by eof 12y ago
Other - Using standard nomenclature in a non-standard way I'd call myself a "Spiritual Atheist."
I had been an atheist of the "cold" variety: life spontaneously arose from non-life in an undefined fashion, and everything relevant to the conversation evolved from this first life.. only the "observable" could be real.
Seemingly non-local consciousness-connections (a dream where something bad happens to someone and they die that night, you think of someone in that moment they call you, esoteric initations into new-agey meditation [law of attraction, remove viewing], they way the universe seems to be inscrutably "nicer" to me the more buddha-like it is [e.g. when regularly meditating])
The reasons my metaphysics changed are nearly ineffable; and are certainly not objectively verifiable (at least by me). The ramifications are easy to grok:
- The universe is a holy playground
- The universe has some sort of intention
- The more your intentions fall in line with the intentions of the universe, the more satisfying life is.
There are also some non-obvious (but ultimately important) "actionable" ramifications: primarily that sometimes the best way to solve a corporeal problem is to get the spiritual aspect (ie, the interface between you and the universe) in line.
- gyrogarant 12y agoPlease tell me: What do you mean with this line: 'The more your intentions fall in line with the intentions of the universe, the more satisfying life is.' I am curious.