That's absolutely correct. I was responding to the naked phrase "technically allowed," which in hindsight is ambiguous (ie, "allowed under the law via a techni

That's absolutely correct. I was responding to the naked phrase "technically allowed," which in hindsight is ambiguous (ie, "allowed under the law via a technicality," or "technologically feasible"). Rereading, I still think I interpreted correctly the first time, but really can't be sure. Good catch.