4 ms·
'...but it's rock solid...'. From someone who did a lot of robustness testing against WebSphere in the course of writing a JMS adapter, you have got to be kiddi
by anonymousDan 12y ago
'...but it's rock solid...'. From someone who did a lot of robustness testing against WebSphere in the course of writing a JMS adapter, you have got to be kidding?
- fat0wl 12y agoI think the clarification "watwut" makes is fitting -- it's not like it's complete perfection in every situation, but I use WebSphere 8.0 running a ton of apps written in a pretty wide variety of techs (Portal, Commerce, Message Broker, services). It even runs crappy legacy projects with minimal changes (literally 1 or 2 quick fixes suggested by IDE). Obviously it is a bit opinionated & works best when you code specifically for the APIs/standards it is currently attempting to embrace, but the all the open source scripting tools I've used are way more opinionated. I like WAS's take because I often find that it's exposing services that I don't even know about until I eventually need them. And it's not a lot of bloaty junk, it's essential JavaEE interfaces/protocols. I'll admit it took a while to grow on me and we have fantastic hardware...