3 ms·

I disagree on a couple of points. Information doesn't want anything. There may be a statistical tendency of information to propagate, but it seems to me that t

by clickok 12y ago

I disagree on a couple of points. Information doesn't want anything. There may be a statistical tendency of information to propagate, but it seems to me that the only people who want information to want to be free are those advancing an agenda with a catchy slogan. Further, the only viable endpoint is not totalitarianism-- one can argue about where on the spectrum we stand today, or might be in the future, but in the US we try to strike a balance. Unless you support being able to use whichever country's version of Google that permits things like searching for identity theft, illicit pornography, etc., it seems like we're OK with at least some restrictions on speech. Assuming we accept the EU has the authority to pass such a law, then so long as Google wishes to operate within their jurisdiction, it seems fair that it abides by the law, vis., "deleting data as requested", not "make data inaccessible to those who cannot execute a second Google search on how to subvert the restrictions".

smsm42 12y ago
I'm not sure what you mean by "search for identity theft", but once Google starts accepting requests for banning any content objectionable in any corner of the world worldwide, a mere picture of a woman with her face not hidden by a burqa would be "illicit pornography". You'd say it's too much, but we need to strike a balance between your desires and religious feelings of people in Sudan, Syria and Iran, don't we? And when you're trying to "strike the balance" by trampling on rights, the ones who cry the loudest - i.e. fanatics - will always win, unless there's a strong and impenetrable barrier that they can not overcome. Like the First Amendment in the US, which, despite all efforts, is still standing. But Europe doesn't have it, and there bans on information and suppression of unpopular expression is the norm. This is just one more example of their descent.
syntern 12y ago
You are saying balance, but what you mean is agreement over values. The nasty thing is, people just can't agree on anything, especially on values.

by clickok 12y ago

smsm42 12y ago

I'm not sure what you mean by "search for identity theft", but once Google starts accepting requests for banning any content objectionable in any corner of the world worldwide, a mere picture of a woman with her face not hidden by a burqa would be "illicit pornography". You'd say it's too much, but we need to strike a balance between your desires and religious feelings of people in Sudan, Syria and Iran, don't we? And when you're trying to "strike the balance" by trampling on rights, the ones who cry the loudest - i.e. fanatics - will always win, unless there's a strong and impenetrable barrier that they can not overcome. Like the First Amendment in the US, which, despite all efforts, is still standing. But Europe doesn't have it, and there bans on information and suppression of unpopular expression is the norm. This is just one more example of their descent.

syntern 12y ago

You are saying balance, but what you mean is agreement over values. The nasty thing is, people just can't agree on anything, especially on values.