>>The comparison with git is very shallow, seemingly based on misunderstandings of how git works. It does sound like they misunderstand (or misrepresent) the w

>>The comparison with git is very shallow, seemingly based on misunderstandings of how git works. It does sound like they misunderstand (or misrepresent) the way git works. git is very flexible and its capabilities and limitations follow from its distributed nature. If Fossil tries to be git with a smoother interface and more streamlined workflow, it's not surprising that its repos can go bad and lose your data.