> At this point you DO NOT own a game yet You can claim it's a voucher instead of a game, but the distinction is quite meaningless to me. I can see why they d

> At this point you DO NOT own a game yet You can claim it's a voucher instead of a game, but the distinction is quite meaningless to me. I can see why they do this for business reasons, but it's not something we tolerate elsewhere, generally. And why is it not a restriction if I am forbidden from doing something? We can redefine all the words if you want, but the essential facts that I've paid them money for something and they forbid me from doing certain things with the item I purchased remain.