3 ms·
He owns a house there, has family ties there, etc... One thing I've noticed about many of my colleagues in California - when they get a new job, they don't mov
by ghshephard 12y ago
He owns a house there, has family ties there, etc...
One thing I've noticed about many of my colleagues in California - when they get a new job, they don't move. Indeed, I've actually had colleagues who've changed the company they work at to reduce their commute, rather than just moving.
- mdo2 12y agoUnintended consequences of prop 13
- pgeorgi 12y agoAnd why shouldn't they change jobs over homes? When moving you're not just leaving a home behind, but (often) a social environment. Once there's family, you have to coordinate the move with their job/school/etc situation as well. Switching jobs is the option with the least friction in those scenarios.
- fps 12y agoThat seems odd to you? In the US, most people don't move around that much. This is certainly the case for people with families. I've been in the same house for 8 years and am in the process of moving across town - it's a multi-year process that's extremely personally taxing for my entire family, and we're only moving 2 miles away. I've had 5 jobs in the time I've lived in my current house, and my commute has ranged from 15 minutes (by car) to my current 1.25 hours (by train/bike), depending on the job. A major factor of choosing where I'm going to work is what it will do to my daily commute. I wouldn't consider moving for literally any job, but I wouldn't hesitate to change jobs so I could move.
- ghshephard 12y agoAs a family, perhaps. As a single person - I want a commute of 5 minutes or less, and when I get a new job - I always move. In the last 8 years I've lived in seven places - one of which was a Condo that I owned / sold. I think the Prop13 issue explains why most home owners can no longer sell their homes.