3 ms·
Many people will say that two consenting adults have the right to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own bedroom In that case, both parties are natu
by Confusion 17y ago
Many people will say that two consenting adults have the right to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own bedroom
In that case, both parties are natural persons, in complete freedom, entering into an agreement with each-other that is unlikely to have bad consequences for society. There is not need for government regulation.
As soon as the act those adults want to do becomes nonsexual (e.g. an unpaid internship, unlicensed medicine), that principle goes out the window.
Because in those cases, one of the parties is either not a natural person (but a company) or it's a natural person that performs specific actions that have a much larger chance of having bad consequences.
Companies can only exist by the grace of government regulation. They can be extremely powerful and hence the government must protect its citizens against it's own creations. Government regulation is already the case.
The first purpose of the government is to take care of issues we cannot individually handle. Judging who is fit to be a doctor and who isn't is one of them, as much as maintaining a police force is. Government regulation of this is part of its 'reason for being'.
- jamesbritt 17y ago" Judging who is fit to be a doctor and who isn't is one of them, as much as maintaining a police force is." Hardly. Individuals can very easily manage a police force. Look at Blackwater. The reason you might want the State involved in either of these is because you want it to have a monopoly. I really don't want competing police forces and armies. Having competing organizations that evaluated and licensed doctors might be a good thing.