3 ms·
Any reason why you think this? YAML seems like a more intuitive choice for describing the session/window/pane hierarchy IMO. Your "visual" notation does seem us
by vectorpush 12y ago
Any reason why you think this? YAML seems like a more intuitive choice for describing the session/window/pane hierarchy IMO. Your "visual" notation does seem useful, but I'm not so sure if the benefits merit taking on a new configuration format in my tools layer.
I'll give it a fair shot though :).
- oxidane 12y agoI'm all for standard file formats where they serve a purpose, but they don't really fit here. The point of tmuxomatic was to completely break away from the structure imposed by tmuxinator, tmuxp, and fundamentally tmux, and deliver something so simple and automated that tmux becomes almost transparent. Where any user, expert or novice, is able to create complex arrangements of practically any conceivable layout so intuitively that documentation is unnecessary. However, if you prefer to do your editing in an IDE or graphical editor, a known file format is easier to deal with, and syntax highlighting is nice. I'll add YAML support in version 1.1.