3 ms·
Soooo... a average of 200 pageviews a second - I suppose that doesn't sound as cool. Or, to put it another way; 1 server per 8 pageviews per second Does not s
by epsteinbargraph 12y ago
Soooo... a average of 200 pageviews a second - I suppose that doesn't sound as cool.
Or, to put it another way; 1 server per 8 pageviews per second
Does not seem that efficient when you put it like that. Even a resource hog like a wordpress install can eclipse that level.
*made correction- still not impressed
- NietTim 12y agoWell yeah, but these aren't just plain old text file of course. Database queries, assets, async clients, the whole lot.
- jre 12y agoI think you're missing a 0 somewhere : 560000000 / (60 * 60 * 24 * 31) = 209
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- cruise02 12y agoYou're off by a factor of 10. I have it at just over 200 page views per second. Also, that's the average load over a month. The same hardware needs to be able to handle peak load.
- tiernano 12y agoand they also mention that they could possibly run on a lot less hardware... 7-8 machines + network gear (7 if the load balancer is an appliance, 8 if its a server).