"you can admire what an organization stands for, but not always the way that organization is run" If you don't mind, it seems as if you may have a misconceptio

"you can admire what an organization stands for, but not always the way that organization is run" If you don't mind, it seems as if you may have a misconception about what they stand for. I clearly don't have any of the details, but it sounds like a non-sequitur to talk about an open wireless standard and an open wireless community and then require those discussions to be closed up in an NDA. You may not quite be on the same wavelength on the concept of open standards as they are.