I didn't get that far. There was a question about whether souls(!) can affect the world. It could easily be argued either that if you don't believe in souls y

I didn't get that far. There was a question about whether souls(!) can affect the world. It could easily be argued either that if you don't believe in souls you should answer either 'disagree' or 'neutral', which suggests that we're supposed to treat it as a counterfactual, but in that case, we don't know anything about what "soul" means for the purposes of the question. Basically, this was an interesting idea, but I don't know if it's possible to write questions that reflect a broad enough range of worldviews to actually categorize them. There are probably hundreds of distinct views of "soul", including both people who believe in them and people who don't.