5 ms·
I just want to note that the servers have a ping of ~150 here from India, which is not that fast, but OK. Hopefully some DNS servers will be placed in Asia.
by witty_username 12y ago
I just want to note that the servers have a ping of ~150 here from India, which is not that fast, but OK. Hopefully some DNS servers will be placed in Asia.
- alexnewman 12y agoI ain't changing my dns server to a server in Germany 6 50.242.148.34 (50.242.148.34) 11.825 ms 23.165 ms 11.936 ms 7 vlan60.csw1.sanjose1.level3.net (4.69.152.62) 167.163 ms 173.912 ms vlan80.csw3.sanjose1.level3.net (4.69.152.190) 179.634 ms 8 ae-61-61.ebr1.sanjose1.level3.net (4.69.153.1) 166.071 ms 166.300 ms ae-81-81.ebr1.sanjose1.level3.net (4.69.153.9) 166.493 ms 9 ae-2-2.ebr2.newyork1.level3.net (4.69.135.186) 166.700 ms 167.425 ms 168.243 ms 10 ae-62-62.csw1.newyork1.level3.net (4.69.148.34) 168.031 ms 167.538 ms ae-82-82.csw3.newyork1.level3.net (4.69.148.42) 168.819 ms 11 ae-71-71.ebr1.newyork1.level3.net (4.69.134.69) 168.592 ms ae-81-81.ebr1.newyork1.level3.net (4.69.134.73) 166.472 ms ae-61-61.ebr1.newyork1.level3.net (4.69.134.65) 167.677 ms 12 ae-41-41.ebr2.london1.level3.net (4.69.137.65) 167.766 ms ae-43-43.ebr2.london1.level3.net (4.69.137.73) 167.754 ms ae-42-42.ebr2.london1.level3.net (4.69.137.69) 167.882 ms 13 vlan103.ebr1.london1.level3.net (4.69.143.93) 167.297 ms vlan101.ebr1.london1.level3.net (4.69.143.85) 167.796 ms vlan103.ebr1.london1.level3.net (4.69.143.93) 166.458 ms 14 ae-23-23.ebr2.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.148.194) 165.179 ms ae-24-24.ebr2.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.148.198) 168.929 ms ae-23-23.ebr2.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.148.194) 165.134 ms 15 ae-72-72.csw2.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.140.22) 166.229 ms 171.583 ms ae-62-62.csw1.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.140.18) 166.542 ms 16 ae-3-80.edge4.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.154.136) 168.808 ms 167.824 ms ae-2-70.edge4.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.154.72) 177.082 ms 17 accelerated.edge4.frankfurt1.level3.net (212.162.25.6) 167.854 ms 182.773
- deathanatos 12y agoBecause of the latency? Doesn't that traceroute indicate that most of the delay was just getting to Level 3 in San Jose, through your ISP? (Isn't that 50.242.148.34 node right between level3 and your ISP? Sadly it lacks a name, so hard to say who owns it.) Or because of trust? You're in the US.