2 ms·

There are a bunch of (what I consider to be) bugs in the topic files at present. (The QM one is particularly horribly broken -- actual bug rather than mere conf

by gjm11 17y ago

There are a bunch of (what I consider to be) bugs in the topic files at present. (The QM one is particularly horribly broken -- actual bug rather than mere confusion, I think; the strong-AI one is also pretty bad, but here it's that I think the author of the topic file was confused about some things.) This will become more interesting if it gains the ability to take uncertainty into account more effectively. Unfortunately, I have my doubts about whether their (firmly logic-based) resolution engine can be made to do this without major work.

gwern 17y ago
> The QM one is particularly horribly broken -- actual bug rather than mere confusion, I think Broken link, right? I reported it to them a few hours ago and they/he're apparently working on it.
- gjm11 17y ago
  Nonono, not just a broken link. Something is confusing the inference engine and it's claiming "tensions" and giving "explanations" for them that don't make the slightest bit of sense. The files that define the "topics" are actually on the web -- they expose their git repository -- and there's one thing in the QM file that looks like a mistake, which might be responsible for the trouble.