5 ms·
I don't have a problem with AnimGIFs. They work fine for their intended purpose. Interesting side note: I worked at Jasc Software 20 years ago in technical su
by Titanbase 12y ago
I don't have a problem with AnimGIFs. They work fine for their intended purpose.
Interesting side note: I worked at Jasc Software 20 years ago in technical support, helping people with Paint Shop Pro 7 and Animation Shop.
Animation Shop still works great for creating AnimGIFs and PSP7 still works great for a complete 'vector+bitmap' graphics app. It's impressive that some software is so resilient.
- pornel 12y agoIf by intended purpose you mean animations like smileys, then yeah, it's OK. But if you look at imgur.com or Tumblr you'll find GIF is used mostly for video clips and this results in multi-megabyte files with dreadful quality, e.g. http://ministryofgifs.org/ http://ministryofgifs.org/ gfycat typically reports 15:1 compression improvement when converting to WebM.
- Titanbase 12y agoYeah, sometimes video formats are better, but for some purposes AnimGIFs are fine. How difficult it seems to pick a default codec for the web+mobile web? EDIT: Looks like everyone is concerned with it being open source, but they don't want to pay for it? Or they can pay for it and get a commercial license. Either way, you should be forced to pay! XD
- pjc50 12y agoWe refused to pay the GIF royalties and we'll continue to do so for newer formats.
- ajanuary 12y agoThe amount of RAM that's required to browse tumblr because of the gifs is slightly insane.