4 ms·
> Now, it's going to require some much more serious security guarantee to be used to govern any important organizations (governments, public corporations, etc.)
by saraid216 12y ago
> Now, it's going to require some much more serious security guarantee to be used to govern any important organizations (governments, public corporations, etc.).
I don't think that's the real hurdle for scaling up. The issue for large-scale democracy has always been that, because an individual's time is limited, it's very hard for them to make a reasonable appraisal of everyone else's opinion. If these comment threads were merely thousands of posts long, could you read through more than one of them and still have a life? And that's only thousands; the voting population of the US is a bit over 200 million.
I'm really, really looking for the tool that lets you successfully absorb thousands of opinions around an issue within a reasonable time frame, without intermediaries. That's the killer app for democracy.
- anonymousDan 12y agoOne first step might be to filter out all opinions that are contrary to a set of known facts.
- ende 12y agoWho controls the facts?
- piamancini 12y agoGood point. Maybe thinking of a debate in steps? Some way of aggregating main positions and then allowing users to frame themselves in these if they want to or post an alternative, not yet aggregated opinion.
- jhrobert 12y agoThat's "Liquid democracy"
- saraid216 12y agoNo, liquid democracy is still letting other people do your thinking for you.