3 ms·
Besides the "more accurate at poles" issue, you are also double-counting because you don't need to cover the circumference twice. An alternative is to find the
by mturmon 12y ago
Besides the "more accurate at poles" issue, you are also double-counting because you don't need to cover the circumference twice.
An alternative is to find the Earth's surface area (5.1e8 km^2), and divide by 10mX10m. This gives the number of cells. Then take log base 30 (26 alpha + 10 digit - {"O", "I", "S", "U", "V", "Z"}).
This turns out to be 8.60 characters. To detect all single-character errors, you need a full extra character (9.60).
If you allow all alphanumerics (36 possibilities), you end up with 8.16 characters, plus one for errors is 9.16.
Conclusion: if you were willing to give up some accuracy over oceans, you could get away with 9 characters, otherwise, 10 is the best you can do.