While I acknowledge the possibility that "real" intelligence may be inherently non-computational, it's ridiculous to claim that it "equally might be" so. (which

While I acknowledge the possibility that "real" intelligence may be inherently non-computational, it's ridiculous to claim that it "equally might be" so. (which I take to mean roughly 50% probable). I claim 99.9% certainty that a computational process will demonstrate general human intelligence in the next hundred years, given that civilization isn't decimated before then. We don't even have to be clever enough to organize superpowerful computers into rudimentary general intelligence; we just need to understand our own brains at a fine enough level to emulate them computationally. And, of course, you don't need anything close to general intelligence to do well in sports.