3 ms·

"IMO" ... you didn't find any "early adopters" who were cruising the new postings and agreed with your opinion. Sorry to see that your meta-posting was deemed

by smoyer 12y ago

"IMO" ... you didn't find any "early adopters" who were cruising the new postings and agreed with your opinion. Sorry to see that your meta-posting was deemed more important. EDIT: I just checked the "spurned posting" ... it's important to me (and as described in the linked article, a hard problem to solve).

dang 12y ago
> Sorry to see that your meta-posting was deemed more important. I know what you mean, but wouldn't put it that way. Meta posts are a class of their own. They're reliably popular. If we didn't prune them, meta posts would be all over the front page every day, along with other kinds of reliably popular post that don't fit the mandate of this site.