8 ms·
"Get off my lawn" is an intellectually lazy argument. George Lucas has already famously done repeated "updates" to Star Wars. If it existed only in subscriptio
by jaysonelliot 12y ago
"Get off my lawn" is an intellectually lazy argument.
George Lucas has already famously done repeated "updates" to Star Wars. If it existed only in subscription form, you'd never be able to see the original.
- ceejayoz 12y ago> George Lucas has already famously done repeated "updates" to Star Wars. If it existed only in subscription form, you'd never be able to see the original. Or, you might sign up for a service where access to more than one version is a differentiating feature, and get both for the same subscription price rather than having to buy multiple re-releases.
- icebraining 12y agoWhat makes you think Lucas would grant any service the license to distribute multiple versions?
- dogecoinbase 12y agoThere's also a subtle point here about accessibility of creative works that I think is often missed -- copyright, as a social contract, exists because society has a reason to provide creators with a period of economic exclusivity in exchange for the release of the work. There's no natural or defensible "right" to prevent people from copying. If a creator chooses to release their work in a format that they can retract (e.g. they can negate the societal benefit of the release), society is under no moral obligation to respect their copyright.
- baddox 12y agoYou're right about the intellectually lazy argument, but the rest of that comment made what I think is a substantial and valid argument.