>Within a month of this "right" being instated, evil people were already using it to cover their tracks, and that's a Fact that cannot be ignored. Perhaps it c

>Within a month of this "right" being instated, evil people were already using it to cover their tracks, and that's a Fact that cannot be ignored. Perhaps it cannot be ignored, but what should we do with that fact? The problem with the line of reasoning is that, if left unqualified, it can be carried as far as justification for totalitarianism. So, perhaps until a reasonable standard can be established, I wonder if ignoring that fact is our least bad option. If evil people continue to take advantage, then perhaps that would provide the incentive to quickly get us to court-testing, precedent, and the establishment of a standard. And it may be the only approach that errs on the side of rights preservation in general.