3 ms·
I would say fairly secure based on length Here is the reason: 1. It is 101 characters. If I was brute force attacking I'd imagine I'd target passwords <32 cha
by jtchang 12y ago
I would say fairly secure based on length
Here is the reason:
1. It is 101 characters. If I was brute force attacking I'd imagine I'd target passwords <32 characters. Probably more like 8-16.
2. It has [a-zA-Z0-9]. This isn't bad, but isn't optimal. Add some symbols or non ASCII characters to really screw up brute force attacks.
3. If for some reason this is the password on a system that is not hashing but encrypting and using a cipher in ECB then it is definitely not secure.
Honestly if this was a password on a giant list I'd skip it and move on to easier targets.