That is very cool, indeed! =) I'm stuck with XPath 1.0 still, because XPath 2.0 hasn't found its way to lxml yet -- it seems to be quite a lot of work to implem

That is very cool, indeed! =) I'm stuck with XPath 1.0 still, because XPath 2.0 hasn't found its way to lxml yet -- it seems to be quite a lot of work to implement it.