2 ms·
Google is not really a search company. It's a machine-learning company. It wants to be seen that way, but until it abolishes closed allocation (and maybe it ha
by michaelochurch 12y ago
Google is not really a search company. It's a machine-learning company.
It wants to be seen that way, but until it abolishes closed allocation (and maybe it has, but I haven't heard anything to indicate that it has) it will just be an ads company. It's still a pretty good place to work, by industry standards, but the percentage of people who'll get to work on machine learning is very low.
Google definitely wants to have the image of being the machine learning company because that's a great way to attract talent (even if that talent is mostly wasted under closed allocation). And if you land in the right place, there is interesting work. The reality most people face, though, is that most people (especially outside of Mt. View) aren't going to get real projects and won't be anywhere near the machine learning work.
Google does have a lot of talent and probably would be the undisputed #1 tech company if it implemented open allocation, though.
- programminggeek 12y agoGoogle is an Advertising company and it delivers ads via these platforms like search, mobile apps, etc. It clearly is a tech company, but to pretend it's anything other than an ad delivery machine is sort of ignoring the elephant in the room. Everything goes back to ads. Even Google doesn't bite the hand that feeds it.
- dsymonds 12y agoThat's a common trope, but it doesn't make sense. We don't call the New York Times an advertising company simply because the majority of its revenue comes from ads. Why apply the same standard to Google?